As you know, many Americans
depend on government assistance. Government assistance can be defined as, the
help and support such as money or food given to the low class, poor or needy
individuals and families. Notably, “food aid is one of the largest and fastest
growing of the federal government welfare programs. Over the last four years,
programs spending has doubled, reaching approximately &80 billion in FY
2012. More Americans receive food stamps now than any time in our nation’s
history” (Sheffiel, 1). Despite this, many Americans on welfare assistance still
struggle daily and go through many hardships. Providing food, shelter, and
clothing and even financially stability are all obstacles, many low class and
poor individuals endure.
Currently, it is
getting harder for individuals to receive aid, as many states are requiring
mandatory drug testing for those who are applying for welfare assistance and
food stamps. According to, Yamiche Alcindor in “State aid could be ties to drug
test,” “23 states sleek to adopt stricter laws that would require public aid
recipients to take drug tests. Florida law now requires all aid applicants to
be drug tested while Arizona and Missouri require testing for anyone they “reasonably”
suspect of illegal drugs. This shows that, if aid recipient tested positive,
then he or she will be delayed in getting food stamps; likewise the family will
suffer in addition. Many aid recipients will also be stigmatized as well. Furthermore,
in Colorado Rep. Jerry Sonnenberg, has proposed a bill which would require
applicants in his state’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, to
pay for a drug test prior to government assistance. Not only is this time
consuming but it will take money out of aid applicant’s pocket, as drug test
cost can range from $8-12(Yamiche, 1).
While welfare
assistance can be beneficial, welfare programs should not include mandatory drug
testing. With reason, millions of lower class and the poor have relied on
welfare assistance, as a stepping stone into become self-sufficient. To drug
test millions of aid applicants would simply imply that the government is not
doing its job correctly. Moreover,
drug testing is costly to tax payers, and interferes with our privacy/puts
children at risk. We will examine statistics, stories, and reason in
further posts.
"Making food
stamps more than a handout." Washington Times [Washington,
DC] 10 Oct. 2013: A04. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 21 Oct.
2013.
Alcindor, Yamiche. "State aid
could be tied to drug test." USA Today 1 Mar. 2012:
1A. Global Issues In Context. Web. 21 Oct. 2013.
Topic Sentence: Your topic sentence is a bit vague. It should give a clearer idea of what your post will be about.
ReplyDeleteSupport: Good points, but I think your argument relies a bit too much on quotes. In particular, the second quote in the second paragraph is overly long.
Transitions: Good transitions!
Quote: The second paragraph quotes aren’t cited properly. There should be a parentheses citation at the end of the first quote, and there is no closing quotation mark at the end of the second quote.
Grammar and Spelling: The quotation marks inside the quote should be ‘ not “.
Strong Argument: Your argument could be stronger – try to expand on your quotes.
Interesting topic! Your points are good. However, expanding on your quotes would help strengthen your argument.
I enjoyed this post very much, thank you for sharing. I would like to see maybe a stronger quote (statistical information, however that is not necessary)
ReplyDelete1. Topic sentence was complete and informative
2. & 6. Your support is shown and your argument is stated well with depth to the topic.
3. I do like your transitions very much
4. your quote was in a good place and your MLA citation is perfect
5. Your grammar, spelling, and overall composition is nice